4RaBet India bonus reviews

The welcome screen showed a matched figure next to my Rs 1,500 PhonePe add, in rupees, with a wagering number I could read before I touched a market. I used cricket stakes only. When the counter hit zero I withdrew Rs 2,180. I kept a photo of that counter because bars on other sites have confused me.

I skipped anything that said casino only. The sports welcome text listed which markets counted, and extras were on the list. A Rs 1,000 stake on an IPL total moved the counter. I stopped when it cleared and took the balance out. Chat did not push me toward Aviator to finish it.

A smaller reload offer appeared after my first withdrawal, not before. I skipped it. The fact it was labelled as optional is why this stays high for me. I would rather see a quiet cashier than a number shouted at the top of every screen.

I read the wagering line twice, which is my habit. It was a multiple of the bonus amount, not of my whole balance. I chose not to opt in. The wallet still accepted a plain Rs 700 UPI add with no bonus attached. That choice should be normal. Here it was.

Jaipur, Sunday, Rs 2,000 in. The offer panel split bonus and cash. I finished the sports requirement over two matches, not in one wild stake. The withdrawal the next day matched the cash balance on the screen.

The useful part is the rupee counter, not the headline percentage. I have seen the percentage change between months, so I will not quote one number as if it were permanent. What stayed true in my checks was that the cashier stated the multiple before I opted in.

I wrote down three cashier screenshots across December and January. The welcome multiple was not identical, which is why this page is experience, not a rate card. In each case the excluded games were listed. I could decline.

I am cautious with offers. I added Rs 500, left the bonus box unticked, and placed one KKR bet. Settlement did not mention a leftover wager. That is the outcome I wanted, and it is the one I got.

Chat answered, in a short Hindi note, when I asked whether a tied match would void a bonus stake. The reply matched the rule line on screen. My counter did not move on that void. The next completed match did. I trust a cashier that behaves like its own rules.

Four stars because the wagering multiple on the sports welcome is high if you only take short prices. I knew that before I opted in and I still found it a grind. The screen was honest. The offer is less generous once you do the arithmetic. I cleared part of it and let the rest expire rather than chase.

The opt-in was easy to miss on my first visit, tucked under the amount field. I almost took it by accident. I caught it. Four stars for a clear rule once you open the panel, and a mildly fussy layout.

I compared the written rules with what the counter did on a Test session. They matched. I am not at five because a weekend reload banner used a bigger percentage than the terms line under it. The terms line is the one that applied. Readers should scroll to it.

Do not treat a percentage repeated on a forum as the live offer. I opened the cashier on 6 May 2026 and the figure on that screen was the only one I would trust that day. It was explained in rupees. I did not finish the multiple, so I am not reporting a payout I did not receive.

I opted in only after that split was visible. The welcome panel split cash and the matched part in rupees before I opted in.

I left the offer box unticked and the plain UPI add still worked. No bonus attached. Rs 700 went in as cash with no wager stuck to it.

A forum percentage did not match the cashier on the day I looked. I trusted the screen I had open, not the post.

I read the list. Excluded games were listed under the multiple, not in a footnote I had to hunt. Slots I do not play were marked off the sports bar.

I let the rest expire rather than chase it. Short cricket prices made the multiple a grind, and the screen did not hide that.

A voided tied match did not move the counter. The next completed game did. Stake came back on the void. That is how a void should behave.

I photographed the counter because bars on other sites have lied to me. When it hit zero I withdrew Rs 2,180.

Quiet cashier. The reload offer appeared after a withdrawal, labelled optional. I skipped it.

Withdrawal matched the cash balance, not a fantasy number. I finished the sports requirement over two matches, not one wild stake.

Chat in Hindi agreed with the rule line about a void. Rules matched chat. The reply was short and it matched.

I stopped with the counter unfinished and did not invent a payout. Honest stop.

I caught the box. The opt-in sat under the amount field. I almost missed it, then caught it. Layout is fussy. The rule, once open, is clear.

I scrolled. Readers should too. A weekend banner shouted a bigger figure than the terms line beneath it.

Min stake that counted was shown as Rs 50, which suits a small bankroll. Small stakes can count. Rs 50 stakes moved it. Larger was not required.

I declined, played one match, and settlement did not mention leftover wagering. That is the outcome I wanted.

Not the whole balance. The multiple was of the bonus amount, not of my whole balance. I could do the arithmetic on a napkin.

So this page cannot quote one permanent rate. Two screenshots a month apart were not the same percentage.

Casino-only wording was separate from the sports welcome. Separate products. I did not assume a cricket stake would clear a lobby offer.

I could see remaining rupees, not a vague blob. Remaining Rs 400 was readable.

Clock was visible. Expiry date was on the panel. I did not have to ask. I finished inside the window.

His mistake was reading. The cashier was not the mistake. A friend opted in without reading. His counter told the truth anyway.

I used only extras, which the list said would count. As advertised on that panel. The counter moved on those extras.

Partial progress survived a logout. I came back the next day and the figure was the one I left.

Choice respected. The decline control was a real control, not greyed decoration. Unticked means unticked.

They matched on a session stake. I compared the written multiple with the movement after one stake.

No one in chat told me to open a crash game to finish the bar. No detour. I finished on cricket.

The offer I skipped last month was not forced on the next add. A later Rs 500 add was clean.

Plain numbers. Rupee labels beat a percentage on a poster. I can explain a rupee counter to my mother.

Same UPI ID as the add. I cleared to zero and withdrew the next afternoon.

A small reload was easy to ignore. I left it. Optional is the word that mattered.

The terms line, not the banner, is what the counter followed. Banner for attention, terms for the maths.

Not a rumour. I wrote the date on the screenshot: 11 May 2026. That date is the only one I will stand behind.